The
Eastern Orthodox Church and its use of Symbols
Until
I made a brief study of the eastern orthodox iconography I did not realize
that the Byzantine artists made such an important ad profuse use of
symbols to express great doctrines of their faith. The three stars on the
image of Mary to indicate her thrice virginity, the adult robes of baby
Christ as he sits on the lap of his mother to suggest his pre-incarnate
existence, the thumb and first finger joined together as he gives his
blessing as an expression of his two natures, divine and human and many
more symbols are used by the Greek iconographers. It is a wonderful
process of election and variation of existing symbols and making also some
new symbols. No wonder that the Greek Orthodox Church has called these
icons the windows to heaven.
Indian
Church
and its use of Cultural symbols.
Now
we consider what the church in India has done with the Indian cultural
symbols. Like in all cultures where the Gospel went in the world there was
always an encounter between the Gospel and the host culture. But the
Indian church was always a little hesitant to use the local cultural idiom
whether it is in the song dance and drama or with the pictures. The Gospel
has been brought to us in a western pot and we did not break the pot to
let the Gospel plant grow in Indian soil. Some one has said that the
Indian Church has not offered even a decent heresy to the universal
church. Our hymns are translations of the western hymns sung to western
tunes, our creeds and liturgies are carbon copies of their western
counterparts, and R.S. Boyd has called this the Latin captivity of the
Indian Church (see R.S. Boyd, Indian Church and Latin Captivity).
Our fear has been that of syncretism. Indian symbols, images and cultural
expressions to us are all Hindu. We do not see the symbol of light and joy
in the festival of Deepavali, we quickly think of the demon killed by
Hindu Gods. But these myths and archetypes, like the myth of the flood,
coexisted in several cultures and we never gave our meaning to some of
these Indian symbols. ALL this to us is Hindu and 'heathen'. It is not
unfair to say that some of the older missionaries who came from
puritanical background had no time to study the Indian culture to see what
is good in it. The Lotus for example, is a wonderful symbol for new life,
Asathoma Sadgamaya: „Lord, lead me from darkness into light, from
untruth into truth and from death into life.” I had not problem to use
the lotus symbol in my pictures.
The „Church of Resurrection“ in Germany had asked me to create a
picture for their altar on the theme of Resurrection. I made a picture
including Lotus and preached on the 30th anniversary of this parish. This
was accepted with joy as shared from another culture. The Hastha mudras
or hand gestures of Hindu iconography are excellent to express „Our
faith in Christ“, „He is the comforter and he is the giver of the gift
of eternal life“.
Our problem in this respect was on two counts - one were the already
mentioned older missionaries who had no idea of an openness to our culture,
and the other problem is that we Christians in India are still living
centuries behind times, and we think we are conservative. Fortunately
there is a happy change coming. One scholar has discovered that the Lotus
idea has become almost Christian now for what it signifies (Daniel Johnson
Flemming, Christian Symbols in a World Community. Friendship Press New
York). Many schools and colleges in India have the Lotus in their logo:
- The
Dornakal Cathedral, which owes its inspiration to Bishop Azariah, has
banana flowers at the top of its pillars.
- The
logo of the Church of South India has Lotus prominently in it.
- Artists
like Jyothi Sahi, Fonseco have tried inculturation with symbols. When
Jyothi Sahi made Christ figure as dancing on the tree, our fellow
Christians have said it is Hindu and they see Shiva and not Christ.
But thanks to Sydney Carter’s Hymn of the dancing Christ the idea is
not too objectionable now.
When
I made once the Christ image with a third eye on the forehead even our
Christian intellectuals did not see that I am speaking about the all
seeing eye of the cosmic Christ. Once I made the Gospel story in Indian
dance form with Hindu girls most willingly dancing away the deep messages
of the Gospel. But my church people saw the most unacceptable idiom in
that. They thought that the dance is not biblical, and unbaptised girls
have no right to tell the story especially in dance, which is all Hindu
temple-related and associated with temple prostitutes. Many of my people
do not know that the tunes to some of the best Western church hymns we
sing come from pubs and dance houses.
Conclusion
Symbols
will stay with us as tools of communication along with the spoken word and
the written word. We can not exist without symbols of one kind or another.
One may even say that symbols will one day replace all languages,
certainly replace the printed page monopoly in course of time. Symbol
language by definition is a hidden language but for the same reason it is
also an open language of liberation and freedom. A symbol speaks different
things to different people, which should be the same truth viewed from
different angles. If one day humanity speaks one single language, that
will be the symbol language reversing the curse of Babel. Then may of our
communications problems will be solved and I think it will be a picture
language like the hieroglyphics of the old Egypt.
|